Skip to content Skip to navigation

Lawyers Report Procedural Irregularities at Trial of Rights Activist Wang Lihong

August 13, 2011

On August 12, 2011, the trial of Wang Lihong (王荔蕻) on the charge of “picking quarrels and provoking troubles” (寻衅滋事) at Beijing’s Chaoyang District People’s Court ended without a verdict. Wang is a well-known and well-respected activist in Beijing who began her rights defense activities after retiring.

The prosecution’s charge is based on Wang’s role in organizing a protest outside a courthouse in Fujian on April 16, 2010, where three netizens were tried. The government charged that the protest resulted in disorder inside the courtroom and traffic confusion in the area, and recommended five years’ imprisonment. Wang has been in detention since March this year.

Wang’s defense lawyer Liu Xiaoyuan (刘晓原) told Human Rights in China (HRIC) that he and co-counsel Han Yicun (韩一村) presented a not-guilty defense. Liu said that, from a legal point of view, the evidence presented by the government has failed to establish the crime with which Wang is charged. Han argued that organizing a protest is a fundamental right of a citizen which is protected under the Chinese constitution. According to Liu, the judge did not allow Han to finish his defense statement and also interrupted Wang’s final statement.

Han told HRIC that there were many procedural flaws in the case. During the police investigation period, Wang was only allowed two meetings with her lawyers; and when the prosecution was preparing the case, the lawyers were not allowed to photocopy case documents or present their arguments before the indictment, contrary to provisions in the law.

Han said that Wang did not have a fair trial. During the hearing, Han said, the prosecution did not present evidence piece by piece, but in a lump sum, making it impossible for the defense lawyers to examine each item. According to Han, he and Liu had requested a large courtroom in anticipation of a large group of supporters—and several hundred supporters did gather outside the court on the morning of the trial. However, the lawyers found out that the courtroom could only accommodate five observers. At the end, Wang’s son Qi Jianxian (齐健翔) was the only one allowed to observe the trial.

Han said that Wang has back problems but her spirit was good, and that she is prepared to go to prison.

Fan Yanqiong, one of the three netizens who were tried on April 16, 2010, said: “As we all know, our trial last year was an unprecedented farce in the judicial history of China and perhaps even the world. This farce is now continuing with Wang Lihong’s trial. All of this clearly tells the world: China’s constitution is nothing but rubbish. China’s law is a shield that officials hide their abuses behind. I have no words to describe my anger!” The three netizens were tried after compiling and posting on the Internet a woman’s account in documents and videos of how her daughter died after being gang raped, and how the police covered up the crime.

Explore Topics

709 Crackdown Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention All about law Arbitrary Detention
Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship
Charter 08 Children Chinese Law Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists
Citizen Participation Civil Society Commentary Communist Party Of China Constitution Consumer Safety
Contending views Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current affairs Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Elections Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China
Family Planning Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion
Government Accountability Government regulation Government transparency Hong Kong House Arrest HRIC Translation
Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights developments Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control 
Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International perspective International Relations
Internet Internet Governance JIansanjiang lawyers' rights defense Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping
Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System
Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics One country, two systems Online Activism Open Government Information Personal stories
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Probing history
Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor
Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Special Topic State compensation
State Secrets State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories
Tiananmen Mothers Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations US-China 
Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women Youth Youth Perspective

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/ in /var/www/ on line 1499

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/ in /var/www/ on line 1503

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/ in /var/www/ on line 1503

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/ in /var/www/ on line 1503
Error | Human Rights in China 中国人权 | HRIC


The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.